While economic theory tends to view the
public sector as a cumbersome barrier to business, with blundering government
intervention likely to result in cronyism and ‘government failure’, economist
Marianna Mazzucato, is out to challenge this caricature. Contrary to
conventional economic wisdom, which sees the correct role of government as (at
most) fixing flaws in markets leaving the dynamic private sector to get on with
innovation, she argues that state investment has underpinned some of the most
revolutionary technological developments of the last few decades (Mazzucato 2011). In the video
below she explains her thesis and examines the iphone to reveal the many ways in which public
investment enabled the creation of one of Silicon Valley’s most iconic
products.
These examples are much more than just fun
facts as Mazzucato argues that they show government acting as an
‘entrepreneurial state’ willing to take the biggest investment risks that scare
the comparatively timid and impatient private sector. In particular, she
highlights how the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has acted as a
technology pioneer overseeing the early stages of the internet among many other
important developments. Trenzel et al (2012) provide another interesting
example, examining how government intervention facilitated the shale gas revolution
in the US.
Listening to contemporary politicians with
their mantra of ‘getting the deficit down’, you might be inclined to dismiss
Mazzucato’s argument as interesting but irrelevant: government might have been
able to can get things done in the past but in the wake of the financial crisis
it simply doesn’t have the financial resources to take the big investment risks
any more. Mazzucato also addresses this issue of financing, stating that
governments in the past have been far too reluctant to reap the rewards of
their investments. If the public sector stopped being so modest about its
entrepreneurial role and started demanding remuneration from the companies that
profit from publicly funded innovations, government investment could be
self-financing. Furthermore, figures recently published by the Overseas Development Institute (Whitley 2013) show that government subsidies offered to the coal, oil
and gas industries amount to £2.6bn a year, making Britain the fifth largest
fossil fuel subsidiser in the world.
Mazzucato believes that the next sector
waiting to benefit from public sector innovation is green tech and I agree. Britain, however, is falling behind countries like the US and South Korea where
publicly-funded green initiatives have already been developed:
The UK government should stop subsidising fossil fuels and start an active programme of green investment. A green-investment bank simply won’t be enough as history shows that only after government has taken the biggest investment risks will the private sector start loosening its purse strings.
Taken from 'The Green Investment Gap' (PIRC 2011) |
The UK government should stop subsidising fossil fuels and start an active programme of green investment. A green-investment bank simply won’t be enough as history shows that only after government has taken the biggest investment risks will the private sector start loosening its purse strings.
No comments:
Post a Comment